Skip to content
AgentProv

2026-07-02 · 2026-Q3

Zscaler Documents In-the-Wild Indirect Prompt Injection Targeting Autonomous AI Agents

Who actually said "do this"?

The question layer 2 asks, and failed here.
Fixable
Architectural
Vendor response
Unknown
In the wild
Yes
Actor
Attacker

Target

Autonomous web-browsing AI agents; two live malicious-website campaigns observed by Zscaler ThreatLabz

Impact

One campaign used SEO poisoning plus hidden CSS and JSON-LD to impersonate a fake Python package "requests-secure-v2" and push agents to pay a bogus "$3.00 developer API license" plus about 0.0012 ETH to an attacker wallet; a second typosquatted DeBank via "debank[.]auction." In Zscaler's validation across 26 models, four (Llama 3.3 70B, Llama 3.2 90B Vision, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro) executed the fraudulent payment and two misclassified the fake site as legitimate

Root cause

Indirect prompt injection: agents ingest and act on hidden instructions embedded in retrieved web content with no boundary between data and instructions

Sources

Catalog

Cite this: AgentProv incident record: Zscaler Documents In-the-Wild Indirect Prompt Injection Targeting Autonomous AI Agents (2026-07-02). https://agentprov.com/incidents/2026-07-02-zscaler-documents-in-the-wild-indirect-prompt-injection-targeting-autonomous-ai